Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: The clinicopathological distinctiveness of nodal cytotoxic molecule (CM)-positive Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) remains to be clarified. We investigated 26 patients with this lymphoma compared to nodal CM(+) EBV(-) PTCL (n = 39) and extranasal natural killer/T cell lymphoma of nasal type (ENKTL, n = 44). METHODS AND RESULTS: Nodal CM(+) EBV(+) PTCL patients were more likely to have B symptoms (P = 0.019) and hepatic involvement (P = 0.026) than nodal CM(+) EBV(-) PTCL patients. The former also had more Stage III/IV disease (P = 0.025) but much less cutaneous involvement (P < 0.001) than ENKTL patients at diagnosis. This nodal EBV(+) lymphoma possessed a distinctive immunophenotype of high CD8(+), CD56(-) pattern with an aggressive clinical course (median, 6.6 months). Thrombocytopenia was present in 11 (50%) patients and found to be the strongest prognostic indicator (P = 0.001) in this nodal EBV(+) group. For all nodal CM(+) PTCL cases CD5 negativity, but not EBV positivity, was the significant adverse prognostic factor (P < 0.002) in a multivariate analysis, independent of prognostic index for PTCL (PIT) or International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Nodal CM(+) EBV(+) PTCL constitutes a unique group of lymphomas distinct from ENKTL. The data provide support for our assertion that nodal CM(+) PTCL should be distinguished in the 2008 WHO category of PTCL, not otherwise specified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kato et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: