Key result
Rotational atherectomy resulted in significantly less recurrent neointimal hyperplasia than balloon angioplasty in a porcine model of coronary in-stent restenosis (0.33 vs 0.73 mm2; P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does rotational atherectomy reduce recurrent neointimal hyperplasia compared to balloon angioplasty in a porcine model of coronary in-stent restenosis?
Does rotational atherectomy reduce recurrent neointimal hyperplasia compared to balloon angioplasty in a porcine model of coronary in-stent restenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.33% vs 0.73%
p-value: p=< 0.01
In a porcine model of in-stent restenosis, rotational atherectomy resulted in significantly less recurrent neointimal hyperplasia compared to balloon angioplasty, providing a rationale for its clinical use.
Supports preclinical rationale for rotational atherectomy in restenosis; leaves open translation to human coronary disease.
In-stent restenosis remains a clinical therapeutic challenge. Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an attractive treatment option as it may cause less vascular injury than balloon angioplasty (BA) and, therefore, limit further neointimal response. In an animal model of coronary in-stent restenosis, thermal injury and stenting created neointima (old NI). The treatment of in-stent restenosis with either BA (n = 9) or RA (n = 11) also generated neointima (new NI). The average areas (mm2) of old NI in the BA and RA groups were similar (3.77 +/- 0.40 vs. 3.67 +/- 0.53; P = 0.32). However, new NI formed after treatment of in-stent restenosis was significantly less in the RA as compared to the BA group (0.33 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.73 +/- 36, P < 0.01). In this porcine coronary artery model of in-stent restenosis, treatment with rotational atherectomy resulted in significantly less recurrent neointimal hyperplasia than balloon angioplasty. This animal study, thus, provides a rationale for the clinical use of rotablation in the treatment of in-stent restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McKenna et al. (1998) studied Coronary in-stent restenosis (n=20). Rotational atherectomy vs. Balloon angioplasty was evaluated on New neointima formed after treatment of in-stent restenosis (mm2) (p=< 0.01). Rotational atherectomy resulted in significantly less recurrent neointimal hyperplasia than balloon angioplasty in a porcine model of coronary in-stent restenosis (0.33 vs 0.73 mm2; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: