Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nucleation kinetics of clathrate hydrate is poorly understood because of the difficulties in determining the essential parameter, nucleation rate. Nucleation rate enables quantitative comparisons of the impacts of various additives and solid walls on nucleation. We made a setup that determines the nucleation curves of structure I─forming CO 2 hydrate in quiescent quasi-free water droplets supported by a bulk of liquid perfluoromethyldecalin under isobaric conditions. The results were compared to the nucleation rates of CO 2 hydrate in quiescent water that was in direct contact with stainless-steel walls. We assessed the convergence of the nucleation curves with the increasing numbers of nucleation data and compared our results to the nucleation rates of methane/propane mixed gas hydrate in quiescent quasi-free water droplets and the nucleation rates of gas hydrates of various guest types in the presence of solid walls reported in the literature. We found that (1) 400 nucleation events were sufficient to construct a reliable nucleation curve; (2) the addition of stainless-steel walls promoted the nucleation kinetics of CO 2 hydrate, as it did to methane/propane mixed gas hydrate; (3) the kinetic parameter was significantly lower than the theoretically expected value, whereas the thermodynamic parameter was comparable to both the theoretically expected value and the experimentally determined value reported in the literature; and (4) CO 2 hydrate nucleated over a substantially shallower supercooling range and had higher nucleation rates than those of methane/propane mixed gas hydrate, both in the presence and in the absence of a solid wall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: