Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The bitopic ligand 1,1‘-bis(dipyrazol-1-ylmethyl)ferrocene, Fe[C 5 H 4 CH(pz) 2 ] 2 ( 1; pz = pyrazolyl ring), has been prepared by the reaction of 1,1‘-ferrocenedicarbaldehyde and 1,1‘-carbonyldipyrazole. In the solid state, the bis(pyrazolyl)methane moieties are in an antiperiplanar eclipsed orientation. The molecules are organized into a three-dimensional array by π···π, weak C−H···N hydrogen bonding, and C−H···π interactions. The reactions between 1 and AgBF 4, AgPF 6, AgSO 3 CF 3, or AgSbF 6 yield {Fe[C 5 H 4 CH(pz) 2 ] 2 AgBF 4 } n ( 2 ), {Fe[C 5 H 4 CH(pz) 2 ] 2 AgPF 6 } n ( 3 ), {Fe[C 5 H 4 CH(pz) 2 ] 2 AgSO 3 CF 3 } n ( 4 ), and {Fe[C 5 H 4 CH(pz) 2 ] 2 AgSbF 6 } n ( 5 ), respectively. The solid-state structures consist of coordination polymers with compounds 2 and 3 arranged in helical chains, while the chains in 3 · 1 / 2 Et 2 O, 4 ·1.5C 6 H 6, 5 · 1 / 2 Et 2 O, and 5 · 1 / 2 C 6 H 6 are nonhelical. In these structures, the ferrocenyl groups adopt a similar orientation, where the angle between CH(pz) 2 groups is confined to the range of 85−99° and the silver pyrazolyl coordination spheres are also in very similar distorted-tetrahedral arrangements. Both structural types form three-dimensional supramolecular structures organized by weak hydrogen bonds, π···π stacking, and CH···π interactions. In the helical form, the anions reside in the pockets formed by the close-packed chains, whereas in the nonhelical form, sizable channels, which contain the solvent molecules and the anions, are located between the chains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reger et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: