Discusses four kinds of mechanical energy losses in ultrathin micro-cantilevers of 60 nm, 170 nm, and 500 nm in thickness: thermoelastic loss, air damping, support loss, and surface loss. For the cantilevers with thickness H10 /spl mu/m, thermoelastic loss is negligible. But it becomes significant when the beam thickness H>500 nm and the length L30 /spl mu/m, the Q factors of the cantilevers are proportional to their thickness, i.e., surface loss dominates the mechanical behavior. Annealing the cantilevers of 170 nm thickness at 1000/spl deg/C for 30 s under an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) condition results in an over one order-of-magnitude increase of the Q factor, up to about 2.5/spl times/10/sup 5/ for cantilevers of 30-90 /spl mu/m in length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: