Key result
Patients with a BMI >60 kg/m2 had similar long-term weight loss and complication rates after bariatric surgery compared to those with a BMI of 50-60 kg/m2, with no significant difference in late complications on multivariate analysis (P=0.78).
Why the study?
Patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 undergoing bariatric surgery have higher surgical morbidity, but data correlating surgical risk and efficacy with increasing BMI in severe obesity remain limited.
Does bariatric surgery have similar efficacy and safety in patients with BMI >60 kg/m2 compared to those with BMI 50-60 kg/m2?
Cohort (n=571)
No
Does bariatric surgery have similar efficacy and safety in patients with BMI >60 kg/m2 compared to those with BMI 50-60 kg/m2?
Bariatric surgery demonstrates similar long-term weight loss efficacy and complication rates in patients with BMI >60 kg/m2 compared to those with BMI 50-60 kg/m2.
Supports comparable long-term bariatric outcomes in BMI >60; extends observational data but leaves open randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing bariatric surgery with body mass index (BMI) >50 kg/m 2 are at a higher risk of surgical morbidity when compared with less obese patients, however, there is limited data correlating surgical risk and efficacy with increasing BMI in patients with severe obesity. We hypothesize that regardless of the degree above 50 kg/m 2 their BMI, patients with severe obesity respond similarly to bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 who underwent biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or sleeve gastrectomy at a single institution. Outcomes were compared in patients with a BMI between 50 and 60 kg/m 2 to patients with a BMI >60 kg/m 2 and included percent total weight loss as well as early and late complications. Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression, univariate, and multivariate models. RESULTS: There were 571 patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 who underwent bariatric surgery at our center, 170 (29.8%) had a BMI >60 kg/m 2 . Percent total weight loss was statistically significant between the BMI 50 and 60 kg/m 2 and BMI >60 kg/m 2 groups at 24 months ( P =0.047) but not at 60 months ( P =0.54). No significant difference was found in the incidence of early complications in a univariate ( P =0.46) or a multivariate ( P =0.06) analysis. The BMI >60 subgroup was associated with a higher rate of late complications in univariate analysis (heart rate=2.37; 1.03-5.47, P =0.04), but not in multivariate analysis ( P =0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and complication rates of bariatric surgeries are similar in patients with BMI 50 to 60 kg/m 2 and >60 kg/m 2 , providing evidence supporting similar management of patients despite specific subgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badaoui et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Severe obesity (n=571). BMI >60 kg/m2 vs. BMI 50 to 60 kg/m2 was evaluated on Late complications (univariate analysis) (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.03-5.47, p=0.04). Patients with a BMI >60 kg/m2 had similar long-term weight loss and complication rates after bariatric surgery compared to those with a BMI of 50-60 kg/m2, with no significant difference in late complications on multivariate analysis (P=0.78).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: