Key result
Erector spinae plane block in pediatric cardiac surgery was associated with a higher probability of ICU discharge (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.05-2.79) and shorter hospital stay versus conventional analgesia.
Why the study?
Evidence was limited regarding the impact of erector spinae plane block as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Does erector spinae plane block reduce length of hospital stay and opioid consumption in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with sternotomy?
Cohort (n=80)
No
Does erector spinae plane block reduce length of hospital stay and opioid consumption in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with sternotomy?
Hazard Ratio: 1.71 (95% CI 1.05–2.79)
Erector spinae plane block is a feasible analgesic strategy that may reduce hospital length of stay, accelerate ICU discharge, and decrease opioid consumption in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
May shorten ICU/hospital stay after pediatric cardiac surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
Introduction: There is limited evidence on the impact of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric population undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients under 18 years of age, who underwent cardiac surgery Risk Adjusted classification for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) ≤3 by sternotomy. The study aims to evaluate the effect of ESPB as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery compared to conventional analgesia (CA) on relevant clinical outcomes: length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, opioid consumption, time to extubation, mortality, and postoperative complications. The participants included were treated in a reference hospital in Colombia from July 2019 to June 2022. Results: Eighty participants were included, 40 in the ESPB group and 40 in the CA group. There was a significant decrease (Log rank test p = 0.007) in days to length of hospital stay in ESPB group (median 6.5 days (IQR: 4-11)) compared to the CA group (median 10.5 days (IQR: 6-25)). Likewise, there was a higher probability of discharge from the ICU in the ESPB group (HR 1.71 (95% CI: 1.05-2.79)). The ESPB group had lower opioid consumption (p < 0.05). There were no differences in time to extubation, mortality, and postoperative complications. Conclusion: ESPB as part of multimodal analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery is feasible and associated with shorter hospital length of stay, faster ICU discharge and lower opioid consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruz et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with sternotomy (n=80). Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs. conventional analgesia (CA) was evaluated on discharge from the ICU (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.05-2.79). Erector spinae plane block in pediatric cardiac surgery was associated with a higher probability of ICU discharge (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.05-2.79) and shorter hospital stay versus conventional analgesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: