Key result
A freely accessible computer program was developed to automate continuous error grid analysis and calculate the proportion of measurement pairs in different risk zones for blood pressure studies.
Why the study?
Continuous error grid analysis was recently proposed to describe the clinical relevance of measurement differences between test and reference arterial blood pressure measurement methods.
Provides a freely accessible tool for automated continuous error grid analysis in arterial blood pressure measurement studies.
Facilitates automated error grid analysis in blood pressure studies; leaves open effects on research quality or clinical practice.
We recently proposed continuous error grid analysis to describe the clinical relevance of measurement differences between a test and a reference method for arterial blood pressure (AP) measurement. Here, we present instructions on how to perform continuous error grid analysis in AP method comparison studies and provide a freely accessible computer program for automated computing of continuous error grids and calculation of the proportion of measurement pairs in the different risk zones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grothe et al. (2019) studied Arterial blood pressure measurement. Computer program for continuous error grid analysis was evaluated on Automated computing of continuous error grids and calculation of risk zone proportions. A freely accessible computer program was developed to automate continuous error grid analysis and calculate the proportion of measurement pairs in different risk zones for blood pressure studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: