Key result
Bipolar energy ablation resulted in a significantly higher rate of sinus rhythm at 4 years compared to unipolar energy ablation (67% vs 0%, p<0.001) in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.
Why the study?
Does bipolar radiofrequency energy improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to unipolar energy in adult patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with concomitant surgical ablation of AF?
Observational (n=99)
No
Does bipolar radiofrequency energy improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to unipolar energy in adult patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with concomitant surgical ablation of AF?
Bipolar radiofrequency energy is significantly more effective than unipolar energy for maintaining long-term sinus rhythm in patients undergoing concomitant surgical ablation of AF during mitral valve surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support bipolar over unipolar ablation for sinus rhythm after mitral surgery; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Objective: To evaluate the presence of sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who had mitral valve surgery with concomitant surgical ablation of AF, by unipolar or bipolar radiofrequency. Methods: Adults patients who had mitral valve replacement or mitral valvuloplasty with concomitant surgical ablation of AF, either by unipolar or bipolar radiofrequency, were consecutively included between the 2008 and 2012. Surgery was done by conventional median sternotomy. Results: A total of 99 patients were included; 20 (20.2%) had surgical ablation by unipolar energy and 79 (79.8%) by bipolar energy. There were 76 (76.8%) women, and mean age± SD was 51 ±11 years. The median duration of AF before surgery was 41 months. Type of AF was paroxysmal in 21 (21%), persistent in 11 (11%), and long-standing persistent in 67 (67%). Mean left atrium size in the preoperative period was 5.54 ± 0.82 cm. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58±12.4%. Types of mitral valve surgery were valvuloplasty (n=10), mechanical valve replacement in 30, and bioprosthesis replacement in 59. Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty was performed in 39 patients. Thirty- day mortality was 8/99 (8%). Mean follow-up time was 1274 days (3.49 years). Survival was 92%. After 4 years no patient who had had unipolar ablation was in sinus rhythm, whilst 67% of those who had bipolar energy ablation were in sinus rhythm (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of bipolar energy is superior to unipolar energy in the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients submitted to mitral valve surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canale et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation and mitral valve disease (n=99). Bipolar radiofrequency ablation vs. Unipolar radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Presence of sinus rhythm at 4 years (p=<0.001). Bipolar energy ablation resulted in a significantly higher rate of sinus rhythm at 4 years compared to unipolar energy ablation (67% vs 0%, p<0.001) in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: