Key result
Hematoma block provided effective analgesia compared to brachial plexus block (mean VAS 2.08 vs 1.7; p=0.013) and resulted in a significantly higher reduction rate (OR 3.45; 95% CI 1.52-7.85; p=0.0013).
Why the study?
Analgesia for distal radius fracture reduction depends on safety, simplicity, effectiveness, and costs, prompting evaluation of the hematoma block in a developing country like Nepal.
Does Hematoma Block reduce pain and improve reduction rates compared to Brachial Plexus Block in patients with distal forearm fractures?
RCT (n=100)
Double blind
randomized
No
Does Hematoma Block reduce pain and improve reduction rates compared to Brachial Plexus Block in patients with distal forearm fractures?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.08% vs 1.7%
p-value: p=0.013
Hematoma block is an effective alternative to brachial plexus block for analgesia during distal forearm fracture reduction, offering a higher reduction rate without motor paralysis.
Supports hematoma block as first-line for distal forearm reductions; extends RCT evidence for procedural analgesia choices.
Introduction: Distal radius fractures are one of the commonest fractures and more commonly involve children and elderly. Analgesia during reduction are determined by safety, simplicity, effectiveness and costs. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Hematoma Block (HB) for reduction in distal forearm fractures in a developing country like Nepal. Methods: The study design was double blind randomized control trial performed at tertiary care hospital from July 2016 to August 2017. The patients having radiologically confirmed distal forearm fractures less than 96 hours old in 46 males and 54 females included after obtaining informed consent. 50 patients receiving Brachial Plexus Block (BPB group), and 50 patients receiving HB group during reduction of distal forearm fractures were initially allotted in two arms of randomized group. Pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was recorded before, during, and after reduction. Results: The study showed that HB with (mean ± SD) a VAS score of 2.08 ± 0.85 was as effective as BPB with a VAS of 1.7 ± 0.64 in terms of producing analgesia ( p=0.013), with the advantage of no motor paralysis and a significantly higher reduction rate, odds 3.45, 95% CI 1.52 – 7.85, p = 0.0013. 1/50 patients in brachial plexus block had bronchospasm needing intubation and ICU care where as 1/50 patient with hematoma block and infection which needed incision drainage and external fixation for complete healing. Conclusions: “The Hematoma Block” is to be encouraged in our set up for the reduction of the distal forearm fractures. The technique may be used in those fractures like isolated ulna fractures, minially displaced tibial fractures, fracture fibula where local anesthesia can be easily infiltrated percutaneously The study may be beneficial in managing such fractures and hence, it will help change in therapeutic policies comparing other modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajracharya et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in distal forearm fractures (n=100). Hematoma Block vs. Brachial Plexus Block was evaluated on Pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (p=0.013). Hematoma block provided effective analgesia compared to brachial plexus block (mean VAS 2.08 vs 1.7; p=0.013) and resulted in a significantly higher reduction rate (OR 3.45; 95% CI 1.52-7.85; p=0.0013).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: