Key result
Extracorporeal life support for intractable phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock resulted in an 87% in-hospital survival rate.
Why the study?
The clinical utility of extracorporeal life support in veno-arterial mode for phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock remains unclear.
Does extracorporeal life support improve survival and myocardial recovery in patients with phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock?
Systematic Review (n=62)
Does extracorporeal life support improve survival and myocardial recovery in patients with phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock?
Extracorporeal life support is a viable temporary measure for phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock, associated with high rates of myocardial recovery and in-hospital survival.
Supports ECLS as bridge in phaeochromocytoma cardiogenic shock; extends sparse case data via systematic pooling.
INTRODUCTION: Phaeochromocytoma is a catecholamine-secreting tumour associated with clinical presentation ranging from paroxysmal hypertension to intractable cardiogenic shock. Extracorporeal life support, in veno-arterial mode, application in refractory acute heart dysfunction is sharply increasing worldwide. However, its clinical utility in phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock remains still unclear. METHODS: A systematic review of published reports was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Statement. Searches were accomplished on PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar to identify articles describing the use of extracorporeal life support in the setting of phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock (PROSPERO: CRD42019125225). RESULTS: Thirty-five reports, including 62 patients supported with extracorporeal life support because of intractable phaeochromocytoma crisis, were included for the analysis. Almost all the subjects underwent peripheral cannulation for extracorporeal life support. The median duration of the mechanical circulatory support was 5 days, and most of the patients recovered normal myocardial function (left ventricular ejection fraction ⩾50%). In-hospital survival was 87%. Phaeochromocytoma was removed surgically during extracorporeal life support in 10 patients (16%), while in the remaining after haemodynamic stabilization and weaning from the mechanical support. CONCLUSION: Successful management of phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock depends on prompt recognition and immediate treatment of shock. In this scenario, extracorporeal life support may play a significant role allowing cardiac and end-organ recovery and giving time for accurate diagnosis and specific treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matteucci et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock (n=62). Extracorporeal life support was evaluated on In-hospital survival. Extracorporeal life support for intractable phaeochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock resulted in an 87% in-hospital survival rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: