Key result
Subcutaneous adipose tissue lactate measurement correlated with arterial blood (r2 = 0.71, P < .001), but up to 42% of readings were incomparable, showing a shortcoming in clinical predictability.
Why the study?
Does subcutaneous adipose tissue lactate measurement accurately reflect arterial blood lactate in patients after major cardiac surgery?
Observational (n=40)
Does subcutaneous adipose tissue lactate measurement accurately reflect arterial blood lactate in patients after major cardiac surgery?
Effect estimate: r2 = 0.71
p-value: p=< .001
Subcutaneous lactate measurement is not a reliable substitute for arterial blood lactate monitoring in patients after major cardiac surgery due to poor clinical predictability.
Subcutaneous lactate monitoring should not replace arterial sampling after cardiac surgery; leaves open whether technical refinements could enhance agreement in prospective validation.
Minimally invasive techniques to access subcutaneous adipose tissue for glucose monitoring are successfully applied in type1 diabetic and critically ill patients. During critical illness, the addition of a lactate sensor might enhance prognosis and early intervention. Our objective was to evaluate SAT as a site for lactate measurement in critically ill patients. In 40 patients after major cardiac surgery, arterial blood and SAT microdialysis samples were taken in hourly intervals. Lactate concentrations from SAT were prospectively calibrated to arterial blood. Analysis was based on comparison of absolute lactate concentrations (arterial blood vs. SAT) and on a 6-hour lactate trend analysis, to test whether changes of arterial lactate can be described by SAT lactate. Correlation between lactate readings from arterial blood vs. SAT was highly significant (r2 = 0.71, P < .001). Nevertheless, 42% of SAT lactate readings and 35% of the SAT lactate trends were not comparable to arterial blood. When a 6-hour stabilization period after catheter insertion was introduced, 5.5% of SAT readings and 41.6% of the SAT lactate trends remained incomparable to arterial blood. In conclusion, replacement of arterial blood lactate measurements by readings from SAT is associated with a substantial shortcoming in clinical predictability in patients after major cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellmerer et al. (2009) conducted an observational in critically ill patients after major cardiac surgery (n=40). Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) lactate measurement vs. Arterial blood lactate measurement was evaluated on Correlation of absolute lactate concentrations and 6-hour lactate trend analysis between SAT and arterial blood (r2 = 0.71, p=< .001). Subcutaneous adipose tissue lactate measurement correlated with arterial blood (r2 = 0.71, P < .001), but up to 42% of readings were incomparable, showing a shortcoming in clinical predictability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: