Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The social organization of Clethrionomys glareolus Schreber was studied by live trapping in an enclosure of 0.8 ha in Central Finland between the years 1982–1986. The enclosure consisted of three habitats: abandoned field, brushwood, and moist spruce heath forest. The population density increased from 50 voles ha −1 in 1982 and 1983 to 150 ha −1 in 1984 and 1985. In the summer of 1986 the population crashed to almost zero. In the summer of 1984 after winter breeding the number of breeding females grew to 22 compared with 6–7 in previous years. In 1984 the mature females changed from territorial to group behaviour. During the high population density in 1984 and 1985 breeding stopped already in late July – early August, thus preventing any fence effect. The present study supports the hypothesis stating that microtine social organization is an opportunistic strategy reacting phenotypically to changing environmental – especially food – conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ylönen et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: