Key result
Variant innominate artery anatomy is linked to ~4% shorter ascending aortic length in aneurysm patients.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to analyze thoracic aortic geometry in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm in combination with normal or variant innominate artery anatomy.
Does variant innominate artery anatomy affect thoracic aortic geometry in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms?
Observational (n=72)
Does variant innominate artery anatomy affect thoracic aortic geometry in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms?
Absolute Event Rate: 108% vs 113%
p-value: p=0.021
Variant innominate artery anatomy ('bovine arch') does not worsen thoracic aortic geometry compared to normal anatomy in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms.
Variant anatomy does not worsen aortic geometry; leaves open its role in aneurysm progression or thresholds.
Aim. To analyze thoracic aortic geometry in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm in combination with normal or variant anatomy of innominate artery (IA). Material and methods. The study included 72 patients with non-syndromic ascending aortic aneurysms, which were divided into 2 following groups depending on IA anatomy: patients with a common origin of innominate and left common carotid artery (CILCA, n=28) and patients with normal vessel (No CILCA, n=44). Based on multispiral computed tomography, the ascending aorta and aortic arch geometry were analyzed in all patients. Results. Both groups of patients had ascending aortic aneurysm and aortic root dilatation without significant differences. The ascending aortic length in No CILCA patients was 113 [89; 144] mm vs 108 [63; 143] mm in CILCA patients (p=0,021). The length of tubular ascending aorta in No CILCA and CILCA patients was 86 [63; 123] mm and 82 [40; 103] mm, respectively (p=0,018). Compared to patients in the CILCA group, patients with normal IA anatomy were more often diagnosed with type III aortic arch (27,3% vs 3,6%, p=0,017) and less often with type I aortic arch (63,6% vs 89,3%, p=0,036). Conclusion. Variant IA anatomy ("bovine arch") in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm does not worsen thoracic aortic geometry compared to patients with normal IA anatomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Панфилов et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Ascending aortic aneurysm (n=72). Variant innominate artery anatomy (CILCA) vs. Normal innominate artery anatomy was evaluated on Ascending aortic length (p=0.021). Variant innominate artery anatomy in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm was associated with a shorter ascending aortic length (108 mm vs 113 mm, p=0.021) compared to normal anatomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: