Using audiometric data, this study assessed the Draft American National Standard ANSI S12.13-1991 (DANS) method for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs by comparing it against a standard epidemiologic method. Although the hearing conservation program of the study population was rated as "acceptable" (scale: acceptable, marginal, unacceptable) using the DANS method, the epidemiologic method found a 130% increased risk of hearing loss (relative risk = 2.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.8 to 6.5). In addition, study workers who were excluded from analyses for failing to comply with the DANS criteria were found to be at significantly increased risk of hearing loss (relative risk = 9.1, 95% confidence interval = 3.4 to 24.2). These data indicate that the DANS method may overestimate the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs and systematically exclude workers at high risk of hearing loss from analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adera et al. (1993) studied this question.