Key result
Local heating increased the difference in the ac component of the flux between extreme RR interval length groups from 15.8% during the control period to 23.9% during the heating period.
Why the study?
Does local heating alter the relationship between RR-interval length and pulsatile microcirculatory flow in healthy volunteers?
Does local heating alter the relationship between RR-interval length and pulsatile microcirculatory flow in healthy volunteers?
The relationship between RR-interval length and microcirculatory flux is modified by local heating, suggesting potential for new quantitative laser Doppler flowmetry indices.
Local heating modifies RR-interval dependence of pulsatile microcirculatory flux; leaves open new quantitative laser Doppler indices.
The present study used laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) to investigate the connection between skin microcirculatory flow and the length of the RR interval (LRR). Local heating was performed on healthy volunteers to further elucidate its effect on LDF index. ECG and LDF signals were measured in 102 trials on seven volunteers. Each experiment involved a 5 min control and a 5 min heating-effect sequence. Each laser Doppler flux pulse was categorized into four groups according to its LRR compared with the 5 min average LRR. Synchronized averaging analysis was applied to the four groups of pulses to obtain their averaged waveforms, from which four flux parameters were calculated. The ac component of the flux increased significantly with increasing LRR, and the differences therein between the groups with LRR more than 4% smaller and more than 4% larger than the average LRR increased from 15.8% during the control period to 23.9% during the heating period. Understanding of the different flux responses between the control and local-heating experiments may aid the development of a new index, which helps to avoid LDF's main drawback of providing only qualitative measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsiu et al. (2008) studied Healthy (n=7). Local heating vs. Control was evaluated on ac component of the flux. Local heating increased the difference in the ac component of the flux between extreme RR interval length groups from 15.8% during the control period to 23.9% during the heating period.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: