Key result
Prasugrel reduced cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke by 4.8% compared to clopidogrel at 15 months in diabetic patients undergoing PCI for ACS.
Why the study?
Does prasugrel reduce cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel in diabetic patients undergoing PCI for ACS?
Does prasugrel reduce cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel in diabetic patients undergoing PCI for ACS?
More potent oral antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel can safely improve clinical outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing PCI for ACS compared to clopidogrel.
May support prasugrel preference in diabetic ACS-PCI patients; leaves open need for dedicated prospective confirmation.
Diabetics have a prothrombotic state that includes increased platelet reactivity. This contributes to the less favorable clinical outcomes observed in diabetics experiencing acute coronary syndromes as well as stable coronary artery disease. Many diabetics are relatively resistant to or have insufficient response to several antithrombotic agents. In the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention, hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel is particularly common among diabetics. Several strategies have been examined to further enhance the benefits of oral antiplatelet therapy in diabetics. These include increasing the dose of clopidogrel, triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol, and new agents such as prasugrel. The large TRITON TIMI 38 randomized trial compared clopidogrel to prasugrel in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes. The diabetic subgroup (n = 3146) experienced considerable incremental benefit with a 4.8% reduction in cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke at 15-month follow-up with prasugrel treatment. Among diabetics on insulin this combined endpoint was reduced by 7.9% at 15 months. Major bleeding was not increased in the diabetic subgroup. This confirms the general hypothesis that more potent oral antiplatelet therapy can partially overcome the prothrombotic milieu and safely improve important clinical outcomes in diabetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2011 study conducted a review in Diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=3,146). Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke (4.8% reduction). Prasugrel reduced cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke by 4.8% compared to clopidogrel at 15 months in diabetic patients undergoing PCI for ACS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: