Why the study?
Do expert panel appropriateness ratings for coronary angiography predict angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Cohort (n=3,631)
No
Do expert panel appropriateness ratings for coronary angiography predict angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Expert panel ratings of appropriateness for coronary angiography accurately predict angiographic findings, mortality, and subsequent revascularisation rates.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J.E. Donckier (2001) conducted a cohort in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=3,631). Appropriate indication for coronary angiography vs. Inappropriate indication for coronary angiography was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.75, 95% CI 0.9-3.6, p=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: