Key result
Sacral nerve stimulation inhibited gastric tone and increased gastric compliance and accommodation compared with sham stimulation in rats, mediated via a spinal afferent and vagal efferent pathway.
Why the study?
Impaired gastric accommodation is frequently reported in gastrointestinal diseases, but no standard treatment strategy is available.
Does sacral nerve stimulation improve gastric accommodation in rats?
Does sacral nerve stimulation improve gastric accommodation in rats?
Sacral nerve stimulation improves gastric accommodation in rats via a spinal afferent and vagal efferent pathway, suggesting a potential therapeutic approach for functional dyspepsia or gastroparesis.
Does not support clinical use of sacral nerve stimulation for gastric disorders; leaves open translation from rodent models to functional dyspepsia.
Impaired gastric accommodation (GA) has been frequently reported in various gastrointestinal diseases. No standard treatment strategy is available for treating impaired GA. We explored the possible effect of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) on GA and discovered a spinal afferent and vagal efferent mechanism in rats. Sprague-Dawley rats (450–500 g) with a chronically implanted gastric cannula and ECG electrodes were studied in a series of sessions to study: 1) the effects of SNS with different parameters on gastric tone, compliance, and accommodation using a barostat device; two sets of parameters were tested as follows: parameter 1) 5 Hz, 500 µs, 10 s on 90 s off; 90% motor threshold and parameter 2) same as parameter 1 but 25 Hz; 2) the involvement of spinal afferent pathway via detecting c-fos immunoreactive (IR) cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) of the brain; 3) the involvement of vagal efferent activity via the spectral analysis of heart rate variability derived from the ECG; and 4) the nitrergic mechanism, Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME), a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, was given before SNS at 5 Hz. Compared with sham-SNS: 1) SNS at 5 Hz inhibited gastric tone and increased gastric compliance and GA. No difference was noted between the stimulation frequencies of 5 and 25 Hz. 2) SNS increased the expression of c-fos in the NTS. 3) SNS increased cardiac vagal efferent activity and decreased the sympathovagal ratio. 4) l-NAME blocked the relaxation effect of SNS. In conclusion, SNS with certain parameters relaxes gastric fundus and improves gastric accommodation mediated via a spinal afferent and vagal efferent pathway. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Currently, there is no adequate medical therapy for impaired gastric accommodation, since medications that relax the fundus often impair antral peristalsis and thus further delay gastric emptying that is commonly seen in patients with functional dyspepsia or gastroparesis. The advantage of the potential sacral nerve stimulation therapy is that it improves gastric accommodation by enhancing vagal activity, and the enhanced vagal activity would lead to enhanced antral peristalsis rather than inhibiting it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2020) studied Impaired gastric accommodation. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) vs. Sham-SNS was evaluated on Gastric tone, compliance, and accommodation. Sacral nerve stimulation inhibited gastric tone and increased gastric compliance and accommodation compared with sham stimulation in rats, mediated via a spinal afferent and vagal efferent pathway.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: