Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rotundo R, Nieri M, Cairo F, Franceschi D, Mervelt J, Bonaccini D, Esposito M, Pini‐Prato G. Lack of adjunctive benefit of Er:YAG laser in non‐surgical periodontal treatment: a randomized split‐mouth clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 526–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01560.x. Abstract Aim: This split‐mouth, randomized, clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of erbium‐doped:yttrium–aluminium–garnet (Er:YAG) laser application in non‐surgical periodontal treatment. Materials and Methods: A total of 27 patients underwent four modalities of non‐surgical therapy: supragingival debridement; scaling and root planing (SRP)+Er:YAG laser; Er:YAG laser; and SRP. Each strategy was randomly assigned and performed in one of the four quadrants. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3 and 6 months. Subjective benefits of patients have been evaluated by means of questionnaires. Results: Six months after therapy, Er:YAG laser showed no statistical difference in clinical attachment gain with respect to supragingival scaling [0.15 mm (95% CI −0.16; 0.46)], while SRP showed a greater attachment gain than the supragingival scaling [0.37 mm (95% CI 0.05; 0.68)]. No difference resulted between Er:YAG laser+SRP and SRP alone [0.05 mm (95% CI −0.25; 0.36)]. Conclusions: The adjunctive use of Er:YAG laser to conventional SRP did not reveal a more effective result than SRP alone. Furthermore, the sites treated with Er:YAG laser showed similar results of the sites treated with supragingival scaling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rotundo et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: