Key result
A hand-held ultrasound device demonstrated 93% agreement with a standard echocardiographic system for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Does a hand-held ultrasound device accurately screen for left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients compared to a standard echocardiographic system?
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
No
Does a hand-held ultrasound device accurately screen for left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients compared to a standard echocardiographic system?
A hand-held ultrasound device demonstrated excellent agreement with standard echocardiography for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy, supporting its use as a screening tool in hypertensive patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support point-of-care LVH screening in hypertension; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
AIMS: To test the diagnostic potential of a hand-held ultrasound device for screening for left ventricular hypertrophy in a hypertensive population using a standard echocardiographic system as a reference. METHODS: One hundred consecutive hypertensive patients were enrolled. An experienced investigator performed measurements of the thickness of the anterior septum and posterior wall using the parasternal 2D-long axis view and the end-diastolic dimension of the left ventricle with both imaging devices. Left ventricular hypertrophy was defined as an increase in left ventricular mass > or = 134 g x m(-2) for men and > or = 110 g x m(-2) for women, when indexed for body surface area and > or = 143 g x m(-1) for men and > or = 102 g x m(-1) for women, when indexed for height. RESULTS: Sixty-five men and 35 women were studied (age 60 +/- 11 years); mean duration of hypertension: 13 +/- 11 years; mean blood pressures: systolic 150 +/- 20 mmHg and diastolic 89 +/- 11 mmHg. The anterior septum and posterior wall were visualized in all patients with both imaging devices. The standard echocardiographic system identified left ventricular hypertrophy by body surface area in 18 (18%) patients and by height in 26 (26%) patients. The agreement between the standard echocardiographic system and the hand-held device for the assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy was 93%, kappa: 0.77 (left ventricular mass/body surface area) and 90%, kappa: 0.76 (left ventricular mass/height). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that hand-held devices can be effectively applied for screening for left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E Vourvouri (2002) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=100). Hand-held ultrasound device vs. Standard echocardiographic system was evaluated on Agreement for the assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy (indexed by body surface area) (kappa 0.77). A hand-held ultrasound device demonstrated 93% agreement with a standard echocardiographic system for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: