Key result
Healthy individuals older than 60 years had significantly greater distal blood pressure gradients compared to old reference data, demonstrating the need for age-specific reference values.
Why the study?
Are new reference data for distal blood pressure measured by strain-gauge technique in healthy subjects >60 years significantly different from old reference data?
Cross-Sectional (n=45)
Are new reference data for distal blood pressure measured by strain-gauge technique in healthy subjects >60 years significantly different from old reference data?
Reference data for distal blood pressure measurements should be age-adjusted, as normal gradients differ significantly in patients older than 60 years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Existing distal BP references may misclassify gradients in adults >60; leaves open need for age-specific norms pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Most patients referred to our department for distal blood pressure (DBP) determination on suspicion of arterial peripheral vascular disease (apvd) are more than 60 years of age, whereas the only available reference data for resting pressure are based on data from healthy individuals aged between 43 and 57 years. Our aim was to investigate whether newly collected reference data for DBP measured using the strain-gauge technique in healthy subjects older than 60 years and in others between 45 and 58 years were significantly different from the old reference data used in daily practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: . Group I comprised 31 healthy persons aged between 61 and 87 years and group II 14 healthy middle-aged hospital staff members aged between 45 and 58 years. Strict rules of inclusion were followed. RESULTS: For group I, significantly greater gradients (DBP(toe) - systolic arm blood pressure and DBP(toe) - DBP(ankle)) were found in the new reference data compared to the old. No significant difference between the mean values of the gradient (DBP(ankle) - systolic arm blood pressure) was found between the old and new reference data, although the variation was significantly wider in the new reference data; the lower level of normality was therefore -15 mmHg compared to 0 mmHg in the old reference data. For group II, no significant differences between the gradients were found comparing the new and old reference data. CONCLUSION: These new data indicate that reference data gathered from middle-aged subjects should be changed when DBP measurements are used in patients older than 60 years of age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arveschoug et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=45). Older age (>60 years) vs. Old reference data (43-57 years) was evaluated on Distal blood pressure gradients (DBP(toe) - systolic arm blood pressure and DBP(toe) - DBP(ankle)). Healthy individuals older than 60 years had significantly greater distal blood pressure gradients compared to old reference data, demonstrating the need for age-specific reference values.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: