Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How can social scientists advance discussions around public policy in a world characterized by increasing political polarization? I examine how Social Identity Theory (SIT) and its extensions, subconstituency theory, meritocracy theory, and the SMB model, motivate a scientific and practical interest in universal basic income (UBI) as a necessary policy response to the human capacity for social categorization. I offer a novel theoretical and empirical contribution by integrating SIT with public attitudes toward UBI, framing these discussions through broader economic and political ideologies. Unlike class- or race-based redistributive policies, strong UBI treats everyone equally, a novelty. To structure discussions around public policy and basic incomes, I provide scientific and ideological frameworks for interdisciplinary research on novel policies like UBI. Finally, I present data from a 2022 Congressional Election Study survey experiment to demonstrate that Americans’ policy preferences are motivated by a norm of equal treatment, consistent with classical liberalism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Justin Freebourn (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: