Key result
Lipoprotein(a) is established as a marker of increased cardiovascular disease risk, though significant gaps remain regarding its biology, pathophysiology, and measurement.
Why the study?
Significant gaps in knowledge remain regarding the biology, pathophysiology, metabolism, and measurement of Lp(a) as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular and calcific aortic valve disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lipoprotein(a) is an established marker of increased cardiovascular disease risk, but significant gaps remain regarding its biology, pathophysiology, and measurement.
Research on the importance of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] gained new momentum when it became a potential therapeutic target. Our understanding of this mysterious circulating lipoprotein particle has undergone advances and setbacks since its discovery in 1963 by Kåre Berg’s group. Lp(a) is composed of liver-derived apolipoprotein A and apolipoprotein B-100, and has a similar structure to both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and plasminogen. Lp(a) thus has a proatherogenic and a prothrombotic component, and is associated with the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Findings from epidemiological, genetic and clinical studies have provided compelling evidence establishing Lp(a) as a marker of increased CVD risk in both primary and secondary prevention, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). However, significant gaps in knowledge remain about the biology and pathophysiology of Lp(a). To address these gaps, a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group identified several challenges to fully understand the role of Lp(a) in CVD/CAVD. These include its metabolism and pathophysiological mechanisms, how to measure it, current
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manuela Fiuza (2019) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Lipoprotein(a) was evaluated. Lipoprotein(a) is established as a marker of increased cardiovascular disease risk, though significant gaps remain regarding its biology, pathophysiology, and measurement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: