Key result
Dose escalation of idarubicin in the CIVEP-14 regimen led to significantly higher hematotoxicity, including 80.0% Grade IV leukopenia compared to 39.1% with standard CHOEP-14, without improving survival.
Why the study?
Does replacing doxorubicin with escalating doses of idarubicin (CIVEP-14) improve efficacy or reduce toxicity compared to standard CHOEP-14 in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma?
Does replacing doxorubicin with escalating doses of idarubicin (CIVEP-14) improve efficacy or reduce toxicity compared to standard CHOEP-14 in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma?
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 39.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Dose escalation of idarubicin in place of doxorubicin for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma leads to unacceptable hematotoxicity without improving survival, confirming doxorubicin as the standard anthracycline.
Excess hematotoxicity without survival benefit may discourage idarubicin escalation; leaves open optimal anthracycline selection pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Dose escalation and modification of CHOP has improved the prognosis of patients with aggressive lymphoma; even in the rituximab era, dose escalation for high-risk patients is exploited and frequently limited by drug toxicity. Idarubicin (Id) is a 4-demethoxy anthracycline analogue of daunorubicin with activity against lymphoma and has been reported to cause less cardiotoxicity than other anthracylines. The aim of this study was to replace doxorubicine with idarubicin in the CHOEP regimen and to find the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of idarubicin based on hematotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 11/96 and 09/98, 64 patients (pts) aged 18-75 yrs (pts. 18-60, LDH not elevated, >60 years all risk groups) with newly diagnosed aggressive lymphoma received 6 cycles of CIVEP-14 with an escalating dose of idarubicin, consisting of idarubicin (11-16 mg/m(2) d1) and standard doses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone with G-CSF support. RESULTS: 55 pts (median age 56 yrs) were evaluable for a final analysis with a median observation time of 9.3 years. The CR-rate was 77.4% ; the 5 and 8-year-EFS rates were 46.4% (95%CI 32.5-60.3%) and 43.5% (29.4-57.6%), respectively, and the 5- and 8 yr OS rates were 64.6% (51.7-77.5%) and 59.9% (46.4-73.4%). 14/55 patients have died due to lymphoma progression, and 2/55 patients (3.6%) due to treatment related toxicity, 4/55 due to other causes (3 infections, 1 acute heart failure). In a matched pair analysis comparing CHOEP-14 and CIVEP-14, CIVEP-14 had a higher hematotoxicity with no significant differences in the event free and overall survival for the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, idarubicin cannot be used instead doxorubicin even if its dose is escalated to achieve similar hematotoxicity. Doxorubicin remains the standard anthracycline for the treatment of aggressive NHL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hohloch et al. (2014) studied Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (n=110). Idarubicin (CIVEP-14) vs. Doxorubicin (CHOEP-14) was evaluated on Grade IV leukopenia (p=<0.001). Dose escalation of idarubicin in the CIVEP-14 regimen led to significantly higher hematotoxicity, including 80.0% Grade IV leukopenia compared to 39.1% with standard CHOEP-14, without improving survival.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: