Key result
A pilot phase of 200 colorectal cancer patients demonstrated the feasibility and adequate adherence of hospital-supervised and home-supported pre- and postoperative exercise programs.
Why the study?
The study was designed to assess the feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of pre- and postoperative exercise on recovery outcomes in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection.
Does pre- and postoperative exercise improve postoperative recovery outcomes in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection?
RCT (n=200)
Open-label
1:1:1
Yes
Does pre- and postoperative exercise improve postoperative recovery outcomes in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection?
The PREPARE-ABC pilot phase confirmed the feasibility of recruiting and delivering pre- and postoperative exercise interventions to colorectal cancer patients, allowing progression to a fully powered trial.
Establishes feasibility of pre- and postoperative exercise delivery in colorectal cancer resection; confirms readiness for a powered RCT to test recovery benefits.
Aim PREPARE‐ABC is a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial including an internal pilot designed to assess the clinical and cost‐effectiveness of pre‐ and postoperative exercise in relation to short‐ and longer‐term postoperative recovery outcomes in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. Here, we report on internal pilot phase data for the first 200 patients randomised to the trial, which included prespecified stop‐go criteria used to inform the decision to progress to the fully powered trial by the funder. Methods Eligible and consenting patients are randomly assigned (1:1:1) to hospital‐supervised exercise, home‐supported exercise or treatment as usual (TAU). Randomisation is concealed but clinical teams providing treatment and participants are unmasked. Primary outcomes are 30‐day morbidity (Clavien‐Dindo) and 12‐month health‐related quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study Health Questionnaire). Here, we present findings from the prespecified pilot phase which assessed feasibility of site set up, recruitment, adherence and acceptability of trial processes to patients and site staff. Results Between 9 November 2016 and 18 May 2018, 18 sites were set up, with 200 patients randomised to either hospital‐supervised exercise (68), home‐supported exercise (69) or treatment as usual (TAU) (63). Across the groups, 19 patients did not proceed to surgery or withdrew and 52% experienced a complication. Over half of the participants (57%) in the hospital‐supervised group attended ≥6 preoperative sessions and 50% attended ≥5 monthly postoperative exercise “booster sessions”. In the home‐supported group, 70% patients engaged with ≥2 telephone support sessions in the preoperative phase and 80% engaged in ≥5 monthly telephone support “booster sessions”. Adverse events were reported by 22 patients and three patients reported a serious adverse event. The majority of complications were Clavien‐Dindo grades 1–2; however, 16 patients experienced one or more Clavien‐Dindo grade 3–4 complication(s). Conclusions Results of the internal pilot phase confirm the feasibility of site set‐up and patient recruitment, representativeness of the sample population and adequate adherence to hospital‐supervised and home‐supported exercise. On the basis of these positive results, progression to the fully‐powered trial was authorised by the funder.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted an RCT in Colorectal cancer (n=200). Hospital-supervised or home-supported exercise vs. Treatment as usual (TAU) was evaluated on Feasibility of site set up, recruitment, adherence and acceptability of trial processes. A pilot phase of 200 colorectal cancer patients demonstrated the feasibility and adequate adherence of hospital-supervised and home-supported pre- and postoperative exercise programs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: