Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The total magnetic energies of zero-field magnetization states of ferromagnetic nanospheres with a non-magnetic core are analytically calculated and compared with each other. The particle radius Rₑ and the thickness of the spheroidal shell Rₑ-Rᵢ (0RᵢRₑ, Rᵢ: hole/core radius) are systematically varied for different hard and soft magnetic materials. Based on the results, the corresponding phase diagrams of the lowest-energy configurations are derived. The phase diagrams identify two phases for materials of uniaxial anisotropy (Co: single domain, curling vortex; Nd₂Fe₁₄B, FePt: single domain, two domain) and materials of cubic anisotropy (permalloy, Fe: single domain, curling vortex). In the case of hard magnetic materials the critical diameter for which the single-domain state becomes energetically unfavorable can become more than doubled for ultrathin spheroidal shells (ε=Rᵢ∕Rₑ>0.85) compared to the corresponding bulk sphere of the same particle size. As the stray field in a single-domain spherical hollow nanoparticle is inhomogeneous, the nucleation process takes place inhomogeneously starting at the magnetic poles of the inner surface at Rᵢ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goll et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: