In this study, phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of 60 Turkish honey samples of nineteen different floral origins were evaluated by ultra-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization coupled to tandem mass spectrometry, providing the identification of 32 phenolic compounds. Thyme (1051.58 mg/kg), pine (994.18 mg/kg), carob (935.03 mg/kg), eucalyptus (814.46 mg/kg), rhododendron (680.71 mg/kg), heather (562.59 mg/kg), cedar (561.83 mg/kg), and euphorbia (501.64 mg/kg) present significantly high phenolic content. Moreover ferulic, homogentisic, gentisic, syringic, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic, caffeic, vanillic, p-coumaric, 4-hydroxy benzoic, and trans-2-hydroxy cinnamic acids were the most abundant of the determined compounds. The antioxidant activities of the honeys were evaluated by β-carotene-linoleic acid inhibition, DPPH free radical scavenging activity and ABTS+ cation radical scavenging activity which were measured as IC50: 10.87 – 48.23 µg/mL, SC50: 54.33 – 99.40 µg/mL and SC50: 10.33 – 41.20 µg/mL, respectively. Phenolic compounds are considered antioxidant constituents, and they could be stated as components that account for antioxidant activity in Turkish honeys.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kıvrak et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: