Key result
In an analysis of 68,803 adverse event reports, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was associated with a lower reporting odds ratio for cardiotoxicity (ROR 17.96) compared to conventional doxorubicin (ROR 38.87).
Why the study?
The clinical use of doxorubicin is constrained by side effects, and adverse events associated with liposomal doxorubicin versus conventional doxorubicin have not been comprehensively evaluated in clinical settings.
Does liposomal doxorubicin alter the adverse event profile, specifically cardiotoxicity, compared to conventional doxorubicin in patients receiving chemotherapy?
Observational (n=68,803)
Does liposomal doxorubicin alter the adverse event profile, specifically cardiotoxicity, compared to conventional doxorubicin in patients receiving chemotherapy?
Odds Ratio: 17.96 (95% CI 14.1–22.86)
Liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) is associated with a lower reporting odds ratio for cardiotoxicity compared to conventional doxorubicin, but a higher risk for palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and interstitial lung disease.
Doxil shows lower cardiotoxicity ROR than conventional doxorubicin; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The clinical application of doxorubicin (DOX) is constrained by its side effects. Liposomal doxorubicin was developed to mitigate these limitations, showing improved toxicity profiles. However, the adverse events associated with liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX have not yet been comprehensively evaluated in clinical settings. The FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 were collected to analyze the adverse events of liposomal DOX and CDOX. Disproportionate analysis and Bayesian analysis were employed to quantify this association. Our analysis incorporated 68,803 adverse event reports related to liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX. The relative odds ratios (RORs, 95%CI) for febrile neutropenia associated with CDOX, Doxil®/Caelyx®, and Myocet® were 42.45(41.44;43.48), 17.53(16.02;19.20), and 34.68(26.63;45.15) respectively. For cardiotoxicity, they were 38.87(36.41;41.49), 17.96(14.10;22.86), and 37.36(19.34;72.17). For Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE), the RORs were 6.16(5.69;6.68), 36.13(32.60;40.06), and 19.69(11.59;33.44). Regarding onset time, significant differences adverse events including neutropenia, PPE, pneumonia and malignant neoplasm progression. This study indicates that the use of CDOX warrants careful monitoring for cardiotoxicity, PPE, and interstitial lung disease, especially with Doxil®. Additionally, the onset time of febrile neutropenia, malignant neoplasm progression, and pneumonia associated with liposomal doxorubicin merits particular attention. Continuous surveillance, risk evaluations, and additional comparative studies between liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Cancer (various, including lymphoma and breast cancer) (n=68,803). Liposomal doxorubicin vs. Conventional doxorubicin was evaluated on Cardiotoxicity reporting odds ratio (Doxil vs background) (ROR 17.96, 95% CI 14.10-22.86). In an analysis of 68,803 adverse event reports, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was associated with a lower reporting odds ratio for cardiotoxicity (ROR 17.96) compared to conventional doxorubicin (ROR 38.87).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: