Low-load blood flow restriction training after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may improve quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, and knee joint pain compared to non-BFR training, with no detrimental effects on ACL graft laxity.
Systematic Review (n=152)
Does low-load blood flow restriction training improve quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, and knee joint pain in patients after ACL reconstruction?
Low-load blood flow restriction training after ACL reconstruction may be an effective alternative to traditional strength training, improving quadriceps strength, mass, and knee pain without compromising graft laxity.
Background: Quadriceps strength and mass deficits are common after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Postoperatively, heavy load resistance training can have detrimental effects on knee joint pain and ACL graft laxity. Therefore, low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) training has been suggested as an alternative to traditional strength rehabilitation. Purpose: The present systematic review aimed to investigate the effect of LL-BFR training on quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, knee joint pain, and ACL graft laxity after ACL reconstruction compared to non-BFR training. Study design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE.com, Cochrane Library/Wiley, CINAHL/Ebsco and Web of Science/Clarivate Analytics was performed on 19 February 2021. Studies were included if they compared LL-BFR and non-BFR training after ACL reconstruction with pre- and post-intervention quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, knee joint pain or ACL graft laxity measurement. Systematic reviews, editorials, case reports and studies not published in a scientific peer reviewed journal were excluded. The risk of bias of randomized studies was assessed with the use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results: A total of six randomized controlled trials were included. Random sequence generation and allocation concealment was defined as high risk in two of the six studies. In all studies blinding of participants and personnel was unclear or could not be performed. The included studies used different LL-BFR and non-BFR protocols with heterogeneous outcome measurements. Therefore, a qualitative analysis was performed. Two of the six studies assessed quadriceps strength and demonstrated significant greater quadriceps strength after LL-BFR compared to non-BFR training. Quadriceps mass was evaluated in four studies. Two studies observed significant greater quadriceps mass after LL-BFR compared to non-BFR training, while two studies observed no significant difference in quadriceps mass. Knee joint pain was assessed in three studies with significantly less knee joint pain after LL-BFR compared to non-BFR training. Two studies evaluated ACL graft laxity and observed no significant difference in ACL graft laxity between LL-BFR and non-BFR training. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review indicate that LL-BFR training after ACL reconstruction may be beneficial on quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, and knee joint pain compared to non-BFR training with non-detrimental effects on ACL graft laxity. However, more randomized controlled trials with standardized intervention protocols and outcome measurements are needed to add evidence on the clinical value of LL-BFR training. Level of evidence: 2a.
Koc et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (n=152). Low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) training vs. Non-BFR training was evaluated on Quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, knee joint pain, and ACL graft laxity. Low-load blood flow restriction training after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may improve quadriceps strength, quadriceps mass, and knee joint pain compared to non-BFR training, with no detrimental effects on ACL graft laxity.