Key result
A tailored return to work intervention program is being evaluated to determine its effectiveness on the duration until sustainable return to work compared to usual care in cancer survivors with job loss.
Why the study?
Does a tailored return to work intervention program reduce the duration until sustainable return to work in sick-listed cancer survivors with job loss compared to usual care?
RCT (n=164)
Open-label
Computerized blocked randomisation (blocks of four)
Yes
Does a tailored return to work intervention program reduce the duration until sustainable return to work in sick-listed cancer survivors with job loss compared to usual care?
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether a tailored intervention program can facilitate sustainable return to work for cancer survivors who have lost their jobs.
BACKGROUND: Despite long-term or permanent health problems, cancer survivors are often motivated to return to work. For cancer survivors who have lost their job, return to work can be more challenging compared to employed survivors, as they generally find themselves in a more vulnerable social and financial position. Cancer survivors with job loss may therefore be in need of tailored return to work support. However, there is a lack of return to work intervention programs specifically targeting these cancer survivors. The number of cancer survivors with job loss in developed countries is rising due to, amongst others, increases in the incidence and survivor rate of cancer, the retirement age and the proportion of flexible employment contracts. Hence, we consider it important to develop a tailored return to work intervention program for cancer survivors with job loss, and to evaluate its effectiveness compared to usual care. METHODS/DESIGN: This study employs a two-armed randomised controlled trial with a follow-up period of 12 months. The study population (n = 164) will be recruited from a national sample of cancer survivors (18-60 years), who have been sick-listed for 12-36 months. Participants will be randomised by using computerized blocked randomisation (blocks of four). All participants will receive usual care as provided by the Dutch Social Security Agency. Additionally, participants in the intervention group will receive a tailored return to work intervention program, which includes vocational rehabilitation and supportive psychosocial components, as well as (therapeutic) placement at work. The primary outcome measure is duration until sustainable return to work; the secondary outcome measure is rate of return to work. Other parameters include, amongst others, fatigue, coping strategy and quality of life. We will perform Cox regression analyses to estimate hazard ratios for time to sustainable return to work. DISCUSSION: The hypothesis of this study is that a tailored approach for cancer survivors with job loss is more effective, regarding return to work, compared to usual care. The results of this study will provide insight into the ways in which return to work can be facilitated for cancer survivors with job loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register: NTR3562 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egmond et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Cancer survivors with job loss (n=164). Tailored return to work intervention program vs. Usual care was evaluated on Duration until sustainable return to work. A tailored return to work intervention program is being evaluated to determine its effectiveness on the duration until sustainable return to work compared to usual care in cancer survivors with job loss.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: