Analyzing the harmonic distortions at the point of common coupling is thoroughly addressed in this two-part paper. The main aim of such an analysis is to identify which of the utility and customer sides is significantly responsible for the harmonic distortions at the point of common coupling. In Part I, the meaning of the dominant side is challenged fundamentally. Here, two different definitions for the dominant side are discussed: The side with the larger equivalent harmonic “voltage” or “current” source. It is shown that these definitions are not identical. Subsequently, common methods are categorized in three general concepts based on: the direction of active power flow, the reactive power, and the voltage-current ratio. These three categories as well as their validity are analytically reviewed for both the definitions. The concept based on the voltage-current ratio has been explicitly presented in the original work for identifying the dominant equivalent harmonic voltage source. This concept is developed in this paper for identifying the dominant equivalent harmonic current source as well. In Part II, the application of the methods is illustrated using some common calculation examples. In addition, these methods are described verbally to provide a physical interpretation. Some practical aspects regarding the implementation of the methods are discussed as well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safargholi et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: