Key result
Adding a second-generation microbubble contrast agent to echocardiography significantly decreased intra-observer variability for LV-EF from 12.5% to 7.0% (P<0.001) after acute myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Does adding a second-generation microbubble contrast agent decrease intra- and inter-observer variability for LV-EF assessment in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=48)
Does adding a second-generation microbubble contrast agent decrease intra- and inter-observer variability for LV-EF assessment in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 12.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
The use of a second-generation microbubble contrast agent during echocardiography significantly reduces intra- and inter-observer variability in assessing LV-EF after acute myocardial infarction.
May improve post-MI LV-EF reproducibility; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: Despite its relatively high intra- and inter-observer variability for left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) echocardiography is clinically still the most used modality to assess LV-EF. We studied whether adding a second-generation microbubble contrast agent could decrease this variability. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-eight patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography in second-harmonic mode (SHI) with and without contrast within 5 days after an acute myocardial infarction. LV-EF was determined using the Simpson's biplane method. With contrast intra-observer variability decreased from 12.5 +/- 11.5% to 7.0 +/- 7.0% (P < 0.001) and inter-observer variability decreased from 16.9 +/- 9.9% to 7.0 +/- 6.2% (P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed these findings by demonstrating smaller 95% limits of agreement for both the intra- and inter-observer variability when contrast was used. This improvement in intra- and inter-observer variability was seen to a comparable extent in patients with moderate-to-poor and good quality SHI echocardiograms. CONCLUSION: Echo contrast significantly improves intra- and inter-observer variability for LV-EF, both in patients with moderate-to-poor and good quality SHI echocardiograms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galema et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute myocardial infarction (n=48). Second-generation microbubble contrast agent vs. Without contrast was evaluated on Intra-observer variability for left ventricular ejection fraction (p=<0.001). Adding a second-generation microbubble contrast agent to echocardiography significantly decreased intra-observer variability for LV-EF from 12.5% to 7.0% (P<0.001) after acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: