Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: To determine whether the presence and extent of peritumoral retraction artefact could be used to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival in prostatic carcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 162 consecutive patients treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostatic carcinoma. A variable degree of retraction artefact was present in all 162 analysed tumours. The extent of retraction artefact in prostatic carcinomas ranged from 5% to 55% with a median value of 15% (interquartile range 10-25%). We found no correlation between the extent of retraction artefact in the tumours and patient's age (P=0.608), preoperative (P=0.362) and postoperative (P=0.279) Gleason score or lymph node metastases (P=0.084). In contrast, the extent of retraction artefact correlated with high preoperative prostate-specific antigen (P<0.001), short follow-up time (P<0.001), seminal vesicle invasion and/or extracapsular extension of the tumour (T3 stage tumours) (P<0.001) and positive surgical margins (P<0.001). Furthermore, extensive retraction artefact was associated with poor biochemical recurrence-free survival in both univariate (P<0.001) and multivariate analyses (P=0.013). CONCLUSION: The presence of extensive retraction artefact in prostatic carcinoma correlates with tumour characteristics signifying aggressive behaviour and indicates poor biochemical recurrence-free survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomas et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: