Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pooling, in groups of five, of urine specimens from asymptomatically infected men in a population with 4% prevalence, as determined by case finding, is 100% sensitive and specific and results in a 60.5% reduction in the number of tests needed. Pooling of urine specimens in groups of 10 for the estimation of population-based prevalence is 96.1% sensitive and 100% specific and saves 90% of the test costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morré et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: