Key result
T-wave alternans testing showed low concordance between atrial and RV pacing (62%, κ=0.22), but a negative test during atrial pacing predicted improved long-term survival (P=0.028).
Why the study?
Does T-wave alternans testing using atrial pacing compared to ventricular pacing better predict long-term survival in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers?
Observational (n=63)
Does T-wave alternans testing using atrial pacing compared to ventricular pacing better predict long-term survival in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers?
T-wave alternans testing during atrial pacing, but not right ventricular pacing, predicts long-term survival in patients with structural heart disease and dual-chamber pacemakers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Atrial TWA negativity may aid risk stratification in dual-chamber devices; leaves open whether pacing site should guide testing or management.
BACKGROUND: T-wave alternans (TWA) is a useful method for identifying patients who are at risk for sudden cardiac death. We aimed to determine the effects of different pacing modes on test results and long-term prognostic relevance of TWA in patients following a dual-chamber (DDD) pacemaker implantation. METHODS: Sixty-three patients (mean age 68 ± 13 years) with structural heart disease and recently implanted DDD pacemakers were enrolled. Left ventricular (LV) function was normal or moderately impaired (mean LV ejection fraction 61 ± 13%). All patients underwent sequential TWA testing using atrial and ventricular pacing. RESULTS: During atrial pacing requiring physiologic conduction to the ventricles, 21% of TWA tests were positive, 43% negative, and 36% indeterminate. When using right ventricular (RV) pacing in the same patients, 19% of tests were positive, 40% negative, and 41% indeterminate. When positive and indeterminate tests were grouped as nonnegative, the concordance between atrial and ventricular pacing was 62% (κ= 0.22). After a mean follow-up of 5.9 ± 1.9 years, 18 (29%) patients had died. Improved survival was predicted by a negative TWA test using atrial pacing (P = 0.028), but not with ventricular pacing (P = 0.722). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with dual-chamber pacemakers, there is a low concordance of TWA test results between atrial pacing with intrinsic conduction to the ventricles and apical RV pacing via pacemaker electrode. However, TWA during atrial pacing clearly exerts long-term prognostic relevance in a patient group with preserved LV function and structural heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorenkamp et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Structural heart disease with recently implanted DDD pacemakers (n=63). T-wave alternans (TWA) testing using atrial pacing vs. Right ventricular (RV) pacing was evaluated on Positive TWA test (62% concordance (κ= 0.22)). T-wave alternans testing showed low concordance between atrial and RV pacing (62%, κ=0.22), but a negative test during atrial pacing predicted improved long-term survival (P=0.028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: