Key result
Microvolt T-wave alternans testing during atrial and atrioventricular pacing yielded fewer indeterminate results (17% and 3%) compared with exercise (37%; P=0.015 and P<0.001, respectively).
Why the study?
Does pacing-induced MTWA testing reduce indeterminate results compared to exercise-induced MTWA testing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and ICDs?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
Does pacing-induced MTWA testing reduce indeterminate results compared to exercise-induced MTWA testing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and ICDs?
Absolute Event Rate: 17% vs 37%
p-value: p=0.015
While pacing-induced MTWA testing yields fewer indeterminate results than exercise testing, the low concordance between methods suggests they are not interchangeable for risk stratification.
Pacing-induced MTWA testing was associated with fewer indeterminate results than exercise in ischaemic cardiomyopathy; leaves open whether methods are interchangeable for risk stratification.
AIMS: The absence of microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) identifies a group of patients who are at low risk for ventricular arrhythmia or sudden cardiac death. However, in exercised assessed MTWA, 20-40% of all test results are indeterminate. We hypothesised that MTWA during pacing would yield less indeterminate results. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and prior dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation were enrolled. All patients underwent sequential MTWA testing using an exercise (E), atrial-paced (A), and atrioventricular-paced (AV) protocol. The number of indeterminate tests was lower during pacing (A: 17%; AV: 3%) compared with exercise (37%) (E vs. A: P = 0.015, E vs. AV: P = <0.001). When positive and indeterminate test results were grouped as non-negative, the concordance rates between E and A, E and AV, and A and AV were 60% (kappa = 0.17), 57% (kappa = 0.058), and 70% (kappa = 0.348), respectively. If indeterminate results were excluded, agreements were 60% (kappa = 0.19), 50% (kappa = 0.129) and 67% (kappa = 0.33), respectively. CONCLUSION: Indeterminate test results are less common during pacing. However, there is a low concordance rate between test results using different protocols. This necessitates further study to determine the predictive value of each method in high risk patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kraaier et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n=30). Paced MTWA testing (atrial and atrioventricular) vs. Exercise MTWA testing was evaluated on Indeterminate test results (p=0.015). Microvolt T-wave alternans testing during atrial and atrioventricular pacing yielded fewer indeterminate results (17% and 3%) compared with exercise (37%; P=0.015 and P<0.001, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: