Key result
A combination of serological biomarkers, quantitative rheological markers, and body-surface-adjusted aortic diameters may help define individualized treatment strategies for valve-related aortopathy.
Why the study?
The optimal timing for surgical intervention in valve-related aortopathy remains incompletely clarified, and the limited value of traditional diameter-based intervention criteria necessitates more sophisticated diagnostic tools.
A future risk score incorporating body-surface-adjusted aortic diameters, biomarkers, flow patterns, and valve morphology may help optimize the timing of surgical intervention in valve-related aortopathy.
May inform individualized aortic intervention timing; extends integrated biomarker-flow evidence in aortopathy.
Introduction: Dilatation of the proximal aorta is often associated with an aortic valve disease (e.g. bicuspid aortic valve, aortic stenosis), so-called ‘valve-related aortopathy.’ The definition of optimal timing for surgical intervention in valve-related aortopathy remains incompletely clarified. The limited value of traditional diameter-based intervention criteria has been recognized and more sophisticated diagnostic tools are necessary.Areas covered: This article aims to give an overview on the most recent literature addressing the different forms of valve-related aortopathies and the optimal timing of surgical intervention. It highlights the valve morphotype-dependent (BAV vs TAV) and the valve lesion-dependent aortopathies (stenosis vs regurgitation) and outlines the current treatment options of those pathologies. Further, this review discusses novel serological and rheological markers, potentially helping in the decision-making process in valve-related aortopathy. Systematic literature searches were performed using PubMed and Embase up to July 2019.Expert opinion: The combination of serological biomarkers and quantitative rheological markers for transvalvular flow eccentricity might be an additional useful tool. A possible solution for the future could be a risk score which considers body-surface-adjusted aortic diameters, activity of certain circulating biomarkers, transvalvular flow patterns, possible connective tissue disorders, and the valve morphology to define an individualized treatment strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petersen et al. (2019) conducted a review in Aortic valve-related aortopathy. Surgical intervention timing strategies was evaluated. A combination of serological biomarkers, quantitative rheological markers, and body-surface-adjusted aortic diameters may help define individualized treatment strategies for valve-related aortopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: