Key result
Bicuspid aortic valve in young adults is linked to impaired LV-GLS and higher backward-flow burden.
Why the study?
BAV alters transvalvular flow and increases shear stress on the ascending aorta, but the associations between aortic flow abnormalities, aortic geometry, and ventricular mechanics required characterization using CMR.
Cross-Sectional (n=112)
Observers blinded to clinical and echocardiography data
No
In young adults with bicuspid aortic valve, increased backward aortic flow is independently associated with subclinical impairment of left ventricular longitudinal strain despite preserved ejection fraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subclinical LV-GLS impairment in young BAV patients may warrant closer surveillance; leaves open whether backward flow drives progression.
Objectives: The presence of a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is known to alter transvalvular flow and increase shear stress on the ascending aorta, contributing to alterations in aortic geometry and the progression of BAV-related aortopathy. The purpose of the current study was to characterize aortic flow abnormalities and their associations with aortic geometry and ventricular mechanics using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 56 young adults with CMR-confirmed BAV and 56 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers underwent standardized CMR. Biventricular volumes and function, LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), LV torsional mechanics, ascending aortic geometry, pulse-wave velocity, aortic distensibility, and two-dimensional phase-contrast-derived forward and backward flow parameters were quantified. Associations between myocardial mechanics and haemodynamic variables were assessed using correlation analyses and multivariable linear regression. Results: Compared with healthy controls, patients with BAV exhibited preserved LV ejection fraction but impaired LV-GLS, reduced LV torsion, increased aortic stiffness, and a significantly greater backward-flow burden despite similar net aortic flow (all p < 0.001). Higher peak backward-to-forward flow-rate ratios were associated with less negative LV-GLS (p = 0.006), whereas greater aortic regurgitant volume was also associated with impaired longitudinal deformation (p = 0.001). In multivariable analysis, LV-GLS and aortic regurgitant volume remained associated with the peak backward-to-forward flow-rate ratio within the specified model, whereas ascending-aortic dimensions were not. The final model explained 52% of the variability in backward-flow burden. Conclusions: CMR identified a subclinical ventricular-aortic phenotype in young adults with BAV characterized by altered LV mechanics, increased aortic stiffness, and greater relative backward-flow burden despite preserved conventional LV systolic function. The association between backward-flow burden and LV longitudinal mechanics suggests that these abnormalities may represent interrelated manifestations of BAV disease; however, their temporal and causal relationships cannot be established from this cross-sectional study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Man et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Bicuspid aortic valve (n=112). Bicuspid aortic valve vs. Healthy volunteers was evaluated on Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) (p=<0.001). Young adults with bicuspid aortic valve exhibited impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain (-19.7% vs -21.2%) and a significantly greater backward-flow burden compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: