Key result
Intermittent hypoxic training (live high, train low) significantly increased the low-frequency component of heart rate variability (p<0.01) during exercise in hypoxia.
Why the study?
Does intermittent hypoxia (live high, train low) alter heart rate variability during rest and exercise in elite athletes?
Cohort (n=20)
Does intermittent hypoxia (live high, train low) alter heart rate variability during rest and exercise in elite athletes?
p-value: p=<0.01
Intermittent hypoxic training increases the autonomic nervous system response, mainly through increased sympathetic activity, during exercise in hypoxia.
May signal heightened sympathetic activity in hypoxic exercise; hypothesis-generating for athletes and should not yet change practice.
Changes in heart rate variability induced by an intermittent exposure to hypoxia were evaluated in athletes unacclimatized to altitude. Twenty national elite athletes trained for 13 days at 1200 m and either lived and slept at 1200 m (live low, train low, LLTL) or between 2500 and 3000 m (live high, train low, LHTL). Subjects were investigated at 1200 m prior to and at the end of the 13-day training camp. Exposure to acute hypoxia (11.5% O(2)) during exercise resulted in a significant decrease in spectral components of heart rate variability in comparison with exercise in normoxia: total power (p < 0.001), low-frequency component. LF (p < 0.001), high-frequency component, HF (p < 0.05). Following acclimatization, the LHTL group increased its LF component (p < 0.01) and LF/HF ratio during exercise in hypoxia after the training period. In parallel, exposure to intermittent hypoxia caused an increased ventilatory response to hypoxia. Acclimatization modified the correlation between the ventilatory response to hypoxia at rest and the difference in total power between normoxia and hypoxia (r (2) = 0.65, p < 0.001). The increase in total power, LF component, and LF/HF ratio suggests that intermittent hypoxic training increased the response of the autonomic nervous system mainly through increased sympathetic activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Povea et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Unacclimatized to altitude (n=20). Intermittent hypoxia (live high, train low) vs. Live low, train low was evaluated on Low-frequency (LF) component of heart rate variability during exercise in hypoxia (p=<0.01). Intermittent hypoxic training (live high, train low) significantly increased the low-frequency component of heart rate variability (p<0.01) during exercise in hypoxia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: