Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 10, 2017Journal of Women s Health

Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

WMWairimu MaguaEmory UniversityXZXiaojin ZhuShanghai UniversityABAnupama BhattacharyaTwitter (United States)

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Magua et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9b99d0f2c777f0ee5a8cedhttps://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6021
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus2020 · 4,320 citations
  2. 2Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Female Authority2000 · 597 citations
  3. 3Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty2003 · 563 citations
  4. 4Does Diversity Pay?: Race, Gender, and the Business Case for Diversity2009 · 1,249 citations