Key result
Peak high-sensitive troponin I levels accurately detected coronary artery disease or thrombus in patients with chronic kidney disease (AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.93) and predicted 30-day mortality.
Why the study?
Does high sensitive troponin I or T accurately detect coronary artery disease and predict 30-day mortality in patients with chest pain and chronic kidney disease?
Observational (n=647)
Yes
Does high sensitive troponin I or T accurately detect coronary artery disease and predict 30-day mortality in patients with chest pain and chronic kidney disease?
In patients with CKD and chest pain, interval and peak hs-cTnI levels are more accurate than hs-cTnT for detecting CAD, though both predict 30-day mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May favor hs-cTnI over hs-cTnT for CAD detection in CKD chest pain; leaves open whether either assay improves risk stratification or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Accuracy of high sensitive troponin (hs-cTn) to detect coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with renal insufficiency is not established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of hs-cTn T and I in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: All consecutive patients with chest pain, renal insufficiency (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and high sensitive troponin level were included. The predictive value of baseline and interval troponin (hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI) for the presence of CAD was assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients with troponin I and 534 with troponin T were included, with 95 (84%) and 463 (87%) diagnosis of CAD respectively. There were no differences in clinical, procedural and outcomes between the two assays. For both, baseline hs-cTn values did not differ be-tween patients with/without CAD showing low area under the curve (AUC). For interval levels, hs-cTnI was significantly higher for patients with CAD (0.2 ± 0.8 vs. 8.9 ± 4.6 ng/mL; p = 0.04) and AUC was more accurate for troponin I than hs-cTnT (AUC 0.85 vs. 0.69). Peak level was greater for hs-cTnI in patients with CAD or thrombus (0.4 ± 0.6 vs. 15 ± 20 ng/mL; p = 0.02; AUC 0.87: 0.79-0.93); no differences were found for troponin T assays (0.8 ± 1.5 vs. 2.2 ± 3.6 ng/mL; p = 1.7), with lower AUC (0.73: 0.69-0.77). Peak troponin levels (both T and I) independently predicted all cause death at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD presenting with altered troponin are at high risk of coronary disease. Peak level of both troponin assays predicts events at 30 days, with troponin I being more accurate than troponin T. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 2: 139-150).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ballocca et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Chest pain and chronic kidney disease (n=647). High-sensitive troponin I and T levels vs. Patients without coronary artery disease was evaluated on Presence of coronary artery disease or thrombus (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.93, p=0.02). Peak high-sensitive troponin I levels accurately detected coronary artery disease or thrombus in patients with chronic kidney disease (AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.93) and predicted 30-day mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: