Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief In a previous in vitro study, the authors reported that bone marrow stromal cells (BSCs) have better wound-healing activities than fibroblasts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of BSCs and fibroblasts on wound-healing activity in vivo. Cultured human BSCs and dermal fibroblasts taken from the same patients were tested to compare collagen synthesis and epithelization in a rat wound model. No-cell-treated animals were used as controls. The BSC group showed the highest collagen level, followed by the fibroblast group, and then the no-cell group (P < 0.05). In addition, the best epithelization was observed in the BSC group. These results demonstrate that BSCs better stimulate wound healing than fibroblasts in vivo and in vitro. In a rat wound model, application of human bone marrow stromal cells resulted in greater collagen formation and more rapid epithelization than did the application of human fibroblasts from the same source.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: