Key result
In patients with a positive exercise test, an epicardial fat thickness > 0.65 cm was an independent predictor of critical coronary artery stenosis, with severe stenosis present in 31.9% versus 11%.
Why the study?
Does echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness predict critical coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina and a positive exercise test?
Observational (n=91)
Single-blind
No
Does echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness predict critical coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina and a positive exercise test?
Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness greater than 0.65 cm correlates with the severity of coronary artery disease and may serve as a non-invasive marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with positive exercise tests.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
EFT may aid CAD prediction after positive exercise tests; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: The association between epicardial fat thickness (EFT) and positive exercise test results for the diagnosis of coronary artery diseases (CAD) has yet to be evaluated. This study assessed the predictive value of EFT for CAD on the angiographs of patients with positive exercise tests. METHODS: A total of 91 subjects were chosen consecutively from stable angina pectoris patients who were referred for coronary angiography due to a positive exercise test result. The EFT measures were obtained by echocardiographic parasternal long-axis views on the free wall of the right ventricle at end-systole of three cardiac cycles. Gensini scores were calculated by a conventional coronary angiography technique using a calculation method previously defined. RESULTS: Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed a 0.65 cm (95% confidence interval: 0.628, 0.832, p < 0.001) area under the curve with 74.3% sensitivity and 62.3% specificity at the cut-off value of EFT for the prediction of critical coronary artery stenosis. Following ROC curve analysis, two groups were defined according to EFT cut-off value (groups 1 and 2). The severe coronary stenosis ratio was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (31.9 % vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and Gensini scores were significantly higher in group 2 (6.3 ± 13.3 vs. 16.5 ± 17.9; p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between Gensini scores and EFT in group 1 (r = 0.093, p = 0.549), but there was a strong significant correlation in group 2 (r = 0.730, p < 0.001). Linear multivariate regression analysis revealed that EFT (> 0.65 cm) was the only independent risk factor for critical coronary artery stenosis (β = 0.451, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EFT was significantly correlated with the severity and prevalence of coronary artery disease in positive exercise test patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katlandur et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Stable angina pectoris with positive exercise test (n=91). Epicardial fat thickness > 0.65 cm vs. Epicardial fat thickness ≤ 0.65 cm was evaluated on Critical coronary artery stenosis (≥50% stenosis) (p=<0.001). In patients with a positive exercise test, an epicardial fat thickness > 0.65 cm was an independent predictor of critical coronary artery stenosis, with severe stenosis present in 31.9% versus 11%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: