We designed 2 new types of proximally coated stems (the FMS and FMS-anatomic) based on the endosteal geometry of femora with congenital dislocation or dysplastic hip. The FMS was symmetric while the FMS-anatomic was asymmetric. We compared the proximal fit and fill to the femoral canal, contact stress, relative motion, and load transfer to the femur of 5 stems (FMS, FMS-anatomic, Omnifit, Omniflex, and individual stem) using three-dimensional computer simulation and finite element analysis. The FMS and FMS-anatomic showed a significantly greater fit and fill than conventional stems. The dispersion of the contact stresses and reduction of relative motions in the proximal area were the best in the FMS-anatomic compared to other stems with the exception of the individual stem. In addition, the FMS-anatomic stem transferred most of the load to the proximal femur. Our results suggest that the FMS-anatomic should provide better biomechanical stability at least in the early postoperative period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ando et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: