Key result
Qualitative interviews of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain identified three main barriers (biographical disruption, uncertainty, lack of social support) and three facilitators (acceptance, pain-relieving strategies, social support) for everyday self-management.
Why the study?
The current effectiveness of self-management interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain seems equivocal, potentially because interventions lack an in-depth understanding of the challenges experienced by patients.
Observational (n=11)
Yes
Self-management interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain should address cognitive, emotional, social, and personal consequences to improve effectiveness.
Effectiveness of self-management support in CMP remains equivocal; leaves open which components optimize outcomes in practice and trials.
Background: One in three people worldwide will experience chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). Due to the long-standing nature of CMP, it is inevitable that people with CMP will have to engage in some form of self-management. As highlighted by multiple clinical practice guidelines, it becomes pivotal that healthcare professionals provide effective self-management support. However, the current effectiveness of self-management interventions seems equivocal. This may be due to self-management interventions not being developed based on an in-depth understanding of the self-management challenges experienced by people with CMP. Objectives: This study explored the everyday barriers and facilitators for self-management experienced by people with CMP currently undergoing rehabilitation in a municipality setting. Methods: We conducted 11 one-time, single-person, qualitative interviews of people living with CMP. The interviews were based on a semi-structured interview guide with open-ended questions and analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis to identify the participants experienced barriers and facilitators for self-management in everyday situations. Findings: Three overarching barriers emerged: 1) biographical disruption, 2) uncertainty and psychological distress, and 3) lack of social support. Further, three overarching facilitators emerged: 1) acceptance and optimism 2) pain-relieving strategies and 3) social support. These barriers and facilitators far exceeded participants capability to control their pain. Conclusion: The majority of the barriers and facilitators concerned the management of cognitive, emotional, social or personal consequences of CMP. Integrating these barriers and facilitators into the development of future self-management interventions may have the potential to improve the effectiveness of these interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christensen et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Chronic musculoskeletal pain (n=11). Everyday self-management experiences was evaluated on Barriers and facilitators for self-management. Qualitative interviews of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain identified three main barriers (biographical disruption, uncertainty, lack of social support) and three facilitators (acceptance, pain-relieving strategies, social support) for everyday self-management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: