Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The erratic performance of CCSD(T) for radicals is analyzed using non-Hartree–Fock references as a starting point for correlations and by testing the (2) approach as an alternative to (T) for including higher-order correlation effects. Though CCSD(2) improves upon CCSD(T), correlating from a better-behaved reference makes both theories robust. Comparisons of calculated harmonic frequencies against experiment in a set of diatomic radicals from Brueckner-like orbitals demonstrate improvement approaching closed-shell accuracy. Additionally, we find that using BLYP Kohn–Sham orbitals yields similar improvements, and they are therefore a useful, inexpensive reference for high-level correlation methods in difficult systems. Root-mean-square errors of 1.0–1.2% are found in the cc-pVQZ basis for predicted harmonic frequencies in the test set using OD(T) and KS-CCSD(T), making these approaches quite competitive with CCSD(T) for closed-shell molecules. Finally, these improvements are correlated with spin contamination and the rate of change of the electron density with nuclear displacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beran et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: