This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The components of our rig, which is used for the dynamic calibration of cycle ergometers, were purchased for $4,080 (USA); interfacing the instrument with a computer and printer increased the cost by an additional $2,550 (USA). The rig is essentially a torque balance and was therefore validated against the primary measurements of: angular velocity (rev.min-1), distance (m) and mass (kg). Summing the inaccuracies associated with these 3 measurements yields a worst case error of only 0.3%. The coefficients of variation for a dynamic calibration rig and mechanically braked Monark cycle ergometer assembly ranged from 0.6 to 3.2% for 6 trials at each of the following power outputs: 117.7, 176.6, 235.4, 294.3 and 353.2 W. The instrument therefore has a high degree of precision.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woods et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: