Student-operated extrusion rigs used in engineering education commonly report filament diameter from a torque-transducer signal whose calibration ignores the compliance of the machine frame. The method is formalised as a two-stage estimator: a static compliance identification stage using dead-weight loading, and a dynamic compensation stage that corrects the transducer signal for frame deflection during extrusion. A propagation theorem is derived that maps frame-compliance uncertainty into a bound on filament-diameter error, and the bound is shown to be tight under stated regularity conditions. The design is characterised through a replication-based evaluation of the before-after-control-impact estimator under a declared variance structure (between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5, intraclass correlation = 0.64), with power estimated across 2000 design cells. The evaluation indicates that 54 clusters are required for 5 percentage-point effects at 80% power. The contribution is a calibration protocol that makes the tolerance bound auditable in the teaching laboratory, together with a formal statement of the conditions under which frame compliance dominates the error budget.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aïssa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: