Student-built CNC milling rigs used in engineering education typically rely on low-cost incremental rotary encoders whose quadrature signals carry phase, duty-cycle and index-pulse timing errors that are rarely characterised before the machine is released to students. The treatment is methodological and analytical rather than empirical: no student rig was instrumented and no measurement campaign was executed. A formal error model is derived in which quadrature phase error, edge jitter and index-pulse timing variance combine into a per-revolution position uncertainty, and a conformance bound is stated as a function of encoder resolution, jitter variance and commanded feed. The propagation analysis yields closed-form bounds that a laboratory instructor or technician can evaluate from an encoder datasheet and a single index-pulse timing measurement, and it identifies the feed-rate and resolution regimes in which index-pulse jitter, rather than quantisation, dominates the conformance bound. The contribution is a transferable benchmark protocol and a set of derived bounds that make encoder quality an explicit, auditable design parameter in the student CNC rig, rather than an unexamined assumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntahompagaze et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: